Context: Using student subjects in empirical studies has been discussed extensively from a methodological perspective in Software Engineering (SE), but there is a lack of similar discussion surrounding ethical aspects of doing so. As students are in a subordinate relationship to their instructors, such a discussion is needed. Objective: We aim to increase the understanding of practices and perceptions SE researchers have of ethical issues with student participation in empirical studies. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study of 372 empirical SE studies involving students, following up with a survey answered by 100 SE researchers regarding their current practices and opinions regarding student participation. Results: The mapping study shows that the majority of studies does not report conditions regarding recruitment, voluntariness, compensation, and ethics approval. In contrast, the majority of survey participants supports reporting these conditions. The survey further reveals that less than half of the participants require ethics approval. Additionally, the majority of participants recruit their own students on a voluntary basis, and use informed consent with withdrawal options. There is disagreement among the participants whether course instructors should be involved in research studies and if should know who participates in a study. Conclusions: It is a positive sign that mandatory participation is rare, and that informed consent and withdrawal options are standard. However, we see immediate need for action, as study conditions are under-reported, and as opinions on ethical practices differ widely. In particular, there is little regard in SE on the power relationship between instructors and students.
翻译:方法:我们从软件工程(SE)的方法角度,广泛讨论了在实证研究中使用学生科目的问题,但从软件工程(SE)的方法学角度对实证研究进行了广泛的讨论,但缺乏与此有关的伦理方面的类似讨论。由于学生与教官处于从属关系,因此有必要进行这样的讨论。目标:我们的目标是增进对SE研究人员在学生参与实证研究时对道德问题的做法和看法的理解的理解。方法:我们进行了涉及学生的372项实证性SE研究的系统绘图研究,随后100名SE研究人员就他们目前的做法和对学生参与的意见进行了调查。结果:绘图研究显示,大多数研究没有报告招聘、自愿、补偿和道德认可方面的条件。相比之下,大多数调查参与者支持报告这些条件。调查还表明,只有不到一半的参与者需要道德认可。此外,大多数参与者在自愿的基础上招聘自己的学生,在退出时使用知情同意的选项。学员是否应当参与研究,以及是否应当知道谁参加一项研究。结果:调查表明,强制性参与的情况非常少见,而知情的同意和退约选择是标准。然而,我们立即看到,在SEE级关系下认为,只有很少采取行动。