Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the important determinants responsible for the variation in women's attitude towards intimate partner violence (IPV). Methods: A nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014 data of 17,863 women is used to address the research questions. In the study, two response variables are constructed from the five attitude questions, and a series of individual and community-level predictors are tested. The preliminary statistical methods employed in the study include univariate and bivariate distributions, while the adopted statistical models include binary logistic, ordinal logistic, mixed-effects multilevel logistic models for each response variable, and finally, the generalized ordinal logistic regression. Results: Statistical analyses reveal that among the individual-level independent variables age at first marriage, respondent's education, decision score, religion, NGO membership, access to information, husband's education, normalized wealth score, and division indicator have significant effects on the women's attitude towards IPV. Among the three community-level variables, only the mean decision score is found significant in lowering the likelihood. Conclusions: It is evident that other than religion, NGO membership, and division indicator, the higher the value of the variable, the lower the likelihood of justifying IPV. However, being a Muslim, NGO member, and resident of other divisions, women are found more tolerant of IPV from their respective counterparts. These findings suggest the government, policymakers, practitioners, academicians, and all other stakeholders to work on the significant determinants to divert women's wrong attitude towards IPV, and thus help to take away this deep-rooted problem from society.
翻译:研究的目的是:确定妇女对亲密伴侣暴力态度差异的重要决定因素。方法:2014年有17 863名妇女的全国代表性孟加拉国人口和健康调查数据用于解决研究问题。在研究中,根据五个态度问题构建了两个答复变量,并测试了个人和社区一级的一系列预测数据。研究采用的初步统计方法包括单向和双向分布,而采用的统计模型包括:每个答复变量的二进制后勤、半长期后勤、多重影响多级后勤模式,最后是普遍或正常后勤倒退。结果:统计分析显示,在个人层面的独立变量中,初婚年龄、答辩人教育、决策分、宗教、非政府组织成员、获取信息的机会、丈夫教育、正常财富分数和部门指标。在三个社区层面的变量中,只有平均决策分数在降低可能性方面是显著的。结论:除了宗教、非政府组织成员和部门外,在个人层面的独立变量中,女性的稳定性越低。