We address numerical solvers for a poromechanics model particularly adapted for soft materials, as it generally respects thermodynamics principles and energy balance. Considering the multi-physics nature of the problem, which involves solid and fluid species, interacting on the basis of mass balance and momentum conservation, we decide to adopt a solution strategy of the discrete problem based on iterative splitting schemes. As the model is similar (but not equivalent to) the Biot poromechanics problem, we follow the abundant literature for solvers of the latter equations, developing two approaches that resemble the well known undrained and fixed-stress splits for the Biot model. A thorough convergence analysis of the proposed schemes is performed. In particular, the undrained-like split is developed and analyzed in the framework of generalized gradient flows, whereas the fixed-stress-like split is understood as block-diagonal $L^2$-type stabilization and analyzed by means of a relative stability analysis. In addition, the application of Anderson acceleration is suggested, improving the robustness of the split schemes. Finally, we test these methods on different benchmark tests, and we also compare their performance with respect to a monolithic approach. Together with the theoretical analysis, the numerical examples provide guidelines to appropriately choose what split scheme shall be used to address realistic applications of the soft material poromechanics model.
翻译:我们处理特别适合软材料的软体机械模型的数字解答器,因为它一般尊重热力学原理和能源平衡。考虑到这一问题的多物理学性质,涉及固体和液体物种,在质量平衡和势头保护的基础上相互作用,我们决定采用基于迭接分流办法的离散问题解决方案战略。由于该模型类似(但并不等同于)Biot小机械问题,我们遵循后一种方方程式的解答器大量文献,为Biot模型开发两种类似于众所周知的无排解和固定质分解法的方法。对拟议方案进行了彻底的趋同分析。特别是,在普遍梯流的框架内制定和分析未排解的类似分解问题,而固定质分解法被理解为块对直角值 $L2美元 型稳定化,并通过相对稳定分析模型进行分析。此外,我们建议应用安德森加速法,改进分解法的稳健性。最后,我们测试这些方法的软体和软体分解法方法,在普遍梯流流中制定和分析,我们共同选择采用的方法,同时将它们采用的数字分析方法与数字化办法加以比较。我们如何比较。