Collecting, Classifying, Analyzing, and Using Real-World Elections

We present a collection of $7582$ real-world elections from $25$ datasets from various sources ranging from sports competitions over music charts to survey- and indicator-based rankings. We provide evidence that the collected elections complement already publicly available data from the PrefLib database, which is currently the biggest and most prominent source containing $701$ real-world elections from $36$ datasets [Mattei and Walsh, ADT '13]. Using the map of elections framework [Szufa et al., AAMAS '20], we divide the datasets into three categories and conduct an analysis of the nature of our elections. To evaluate the practical applicability of previous theoretical research on (parameterized) algorithms, we analyze different structural properties of our elections including the level of agreement between voters and election's distances from restricted domains such as single-peakedness. Lastly, we use our diverse set of collected elections to shed some further light on several traditional questions from social choice, for instance, on the number of occurrences of the Condorcet paradox and on the consensus among different voting rules.