Community detection algorithms are in general evaluated by comparing evaluation metric values for the communities obtained with different algorithms. The evaluation metrics that are used for measuring quality of the communities incorporate the topological information of entities like connectivity of the nodes within or outside the communities. However, while comparing the metric values it loses direct involvement of topological information of the communities in the comparison process. In this paper, a direct comparison approach is proposed where topological information of the communities obtained with two algorithms are compared directly. A quality measure namely \emph{Topological Variance (TV)} is designed based on direct comparison of topological information of the communities. Considering the newly designed quality measure, two ranking schemes are developed. The efficacy of proposed quality metric as well as the ranking scheme is studied with eight widely used real-world datasets and six community detection algorithms.
翻译:社区检测算法一般通过比较以不同算法获得的社区的评价指标值来评价,用于衡量社区质量的评价指标包括社区内外节点连接等实体的地形信息,不过,在比较社区检测算法时,社区检测算法丧失了社区在比较过程中直接参与的地形信息。在本文件中,提议了一种直接比较方法,直接比较使用两种算法获得的社区的地形信息。一项质量计量法,即: empph{Toplogical difference(TV)},是根据直接比较社区地形信息而设计的。考虑到新设计的质量计量法,制定了两个排名办法。拟议的质量计量法和排序办法的效力,由八种广泛使用的真实世界数据集和六种社区检测算法研究。