Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.
翻译:此外,虽然提议采用这些技术,以支持对临床医生的认知评估,但从未对自动和感知分类准确性进行比较;在本文件中,我们调查了一种三级自动技术,以及一套用于歧视听力障碍、听力障碍和神经典型语言的手工艺特征。我们提出的分级分类方法不是采用通常使用的多级分类的“一对一”或“一反”方法,而是采用“一对一”或“一反”方法,而是采用等级法。此外,还提议采用分级法,支持对临床医生进行感性评估,但要求语言病理学家聆听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听听、听力和神经典型语言的录音记录,并决定记录属于哪一类。拟议的自动技术是在同一录音上加以评价,自动和感知分级表现是比较的。提出的结果显示,等级分类方法在多级分类方法中比基线的“一反动”或“一反”方法的分类准确性,还进行了感知性研究,从而展示了演示演示结果的高级分析结果。