In many engineering applications it is useful to reason about "negative information". For example, in planning problems, providing an optimal solution is the same as giving a feasible solution (the "positive" information) together with a proof of the fact that there cannot be feasible solutions better than the one given (the "negative" information). We model negative information by introducing the concept of "norphisms", as opposed to the positive information of morphisms. A "nategory" is a category that has "nom"-sets in addition to hom-sets, and specifies the interaction between norphisms and morphisms. In particular, we have composition rules of the form $\text{morphism} + \text{norphism} \to \text{norphism}$. Norphisms do not compose by themselves; rather, they use morphisms as catalysts. After providing several applied examples, we connect nategories to enriched categtory theory. Specifically, we prove that categories enriched in de Paiva's dialectica categories $\mathbf{GC}$, in the case $\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{Set}$ and equipped with a modified monoidal product, define nategories which satisfy additional regularity properties. This formalizes negative information categorically in a way that makes negative and positive morphisms equal citizens.
翻译:在许多工程应用中,使用“ 消极信息” 来解释“ 消极信息” 是有用的。 例如, 在规划问题中, 提供最佳解决方案与提供可行的解决方案( “ 积极” 信息) 相同, 并证明不可能有比给出的更好的可行解决方案( “ 消极” 信息) 。 我们通过引入“ 裸体” 概念来模拟负面信息, 而不是与形态的正面信息相对应。 “ 古董” 是一个类别, 除了安眠药之外, 还会有“ 名” 设置, 并具体说明正统和形态之间的相互作用。 具体地说, 我们证明, 以正统的正统C 和正统的正统性类别 。 { 特别是, 我们的构成规则是 $\ text{ 形态} +\ text{ nophisms} +\ text{ text{ { { nophismismism} $. Norphismus do not as a case a produtypecial; rodutypecials.