The emergence of cooperation among self-interested agents has been a key concern of the multi-agent systems community for decades. With the increased importance of network-mediated interaction, researchers have shifted the attention on the impact of social networks and their dynamics in promoting or hindering cooperation, drawing various context-dependent conclusions. For example, some lines of research, theoretical and experimental, suggest the existence of a threshold effect in the ratio of timescales of network evolution, after which cooperation will emerge, whereas other lines dispute this, suggesting instead a Goldilocks zone. In this paper we provide an evolutionary game theory framework to understand coevolutionary processes from a bottom up perspective - in particular the emergence of a cooperator-core and defector-periphery - clarifying the impact of partner selection and imitation strategies in promoting cooperative behaviour, without assuming underlying communication or reputation mechanisms. In doing so we provide a unifying framework to study imitation-based cooperation in dynamic social networks and show that disputes in the literature can in fact coexist in so far as the results stem from different equally valid assumptions.
翻译:几十年来,自我利益代理人之间合作的出现一直是多试剂系统界关注的一个关键问题。随着网络中介互动的日益重要性,研究人员转移了对社会网络的影响及其在促进或阻碍合作方面的动态的注意力,得出了各种背景依据的结论。例如,一些研究、理论和实验的线条表明,在网络演变的时间尺度比率方面存在着临界效应,此后将出现合作,而其他线条则对此提出争议,建议建立戈尔迪洛克斯区。在本文中,我们提供了一个进化的游戏理论框架,以便从自下而上的角度理解共进进程,特别是出现了一个合作者核心和叛变者,从而澄清了伙伴选择和模仿战略在促进合作行为方面的影响,而没有假定基本的沟通或声誉机制。我们为此提供了一个统一的框架,以研究动态社会网络中的仿制合作,并表明文献中的争议事实上可以共存,只要其结果来自不同的同样有效的假设。