Given a family of null hypotheses $H_{1},\ldots,H_{s}$, we are interested in the hypothesis $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ that at most $\gamma-1$ of these null hypotheses are false. Assuming that the corresponding $p$-values are independent, we are investigating combined $p$-values that are valid for testing $H_{s}^{\gamma}$. In various settings in which $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ is false, we determine which combined $p$-value works well in which setting. Via simulations, we find that the Stouffer method works well if the null $p$-values are uniformly distributed and the signal strength is low, and the Fisher method works better if the null $p$-values are conservative, i.e. stochastically larger than the uniform distribution. The minimum method works well if the evidence for the rejection of $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ is focused on only a few non-null $p$-values, especially if the null $p$-values are conservative. Methods that incorporate the combination of $e$-values work well if the null hypotheses $H_{1},\ldots,H_{s}$ are simple.
翻译:假设相应的美元价值是独立的,我们正在调查对测试美元价值有效的美元价值。在以美元为假币的不同环境中,我们确定哪一种组合美元价值在设定时效果良好。 Via模拟,我们发现如果一美元价值一致分布,信号强度较低,那么Stuffer方法效果良好,如果一美元价值保守,即比统一分布值大得多,则Fisher方法效果更好。如果拒绝美元价值的证据只集中在少数非美元价值上,特别是如果一美元价值不变,那么美元价值是保守的,那么最低方法效果很好。如果拒绝美元价值的证据只集中在少数非美元价值上,特别是如果美元价值不变,那么美元价值也是保守的。