Regulators and academics are increasingly interested in the causal effect that algorithmic actions of a digital platform have on consumption. We introduce a general causal inference problem we call the steerability of consumption that abstracts many settings of interest. Focusing on observational designs and exploiting the structure of the problem, we exhibit a set of assumptions for causal identifiability that significantly weaken the often unrealistic overlap assumptions of standard designs. The key novelty of our approach is to explicitly model the dynamics of consumption over time, viewing the platform as a controller acting on a dynamical system. From this dynamical systems perspective, we are able to show that exogenous variation in consumption and appropriately responsive algorithmic control actions are sufficient for identifying steerability of consumption. Our results illustrate the fruitful interplay of control theory and causal inference, which we illustrate with examples from econometrics, macroeconomics, and machine learning.
翻译:监管者和学者越来越关注数字平台的算法行为对消费产生的因果关系。 我们引入了一个一般的因果推断问题, 我们称之为消费的可控性, 它可以摘要介绍许多感兴趣的环境。 我们关注观察设计和利用问题的结构,展示了一系列因果可识别性假设,大大削弱了标准设计经常不切实际的重叠假设。 我们方法的关键新颖之处是明确模拟消费的动态,将平台视为一个动态系统的控制者。 从这种动态系统的角度,我们能够显示消费的外源变化和适当反应的算法控制行动足以确定消费的可控性。 我们的结果说明了控制理论和因果推断的富有成效的相互作用,我们用计量经济学、宏观经济和机器学习等实例来说明这些相互作用。