Given a boolean predicate $\Pi$ on labeled networks (e.g., proper coloring, leader election, etc.), a self-stabilizing algorithm for $\Pi$ is a distributed algorithm that can start from any initial configuration of the network (i.e., every node has an arbitrary value assigned to each of its variables), and eventually converge to a configuration satisfying $\Pi$. It is known that leader election does not have a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using a constant-size register at each node, i.e., for some networks, some of their nodes must have registers whose sizes grow with the size $n$ of the networks. On the other hand, it is also known that leader election can be solved by a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using registers of $O(\log \log n)$ bits per node in any $n$-node bounded-degree network. We show that this latter space complexity is optimal. Specifically, we prove that every deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm solving leader election must use $\Omega(\log \log n)$-bit per node registers in some $n$-node networks. In addition, we show that our lower bounds go beyond leader election, and apply to all problems that cannot be solved by anonymous algorithms.
翻译:鉴于标签网络(例如,适当的彩色、领导人选举等)的布林上游价格$/Pi$,自稳定运算法是自稳定运算法,可以从网络的任何初始配置开始(即,每个节点都有任意指定给每个变量的值),并最终接近一个能满足$\Pi$的配置。众所周知,领导人选举没有使用每个节点的固定规模登记册来确定自我稳定算法,也就是说,对于一些网络来说,他们的一些节点必须拥有其规模随着网络规模的美元而增长的登记册。另一方面,众所周知,领导人选举可以通过确定性自我稳定算法,使用$O(log\log n)的登记册来解决,在任何美元-无约束度网络中每个节点的比特。我们证明,后一种空间复杂性是最佳的。具体地说,我们证明,每个确定性自我稳定算法的登记册必须使用美元/Om\adexial 来解决我们的低额选举问题。</s>