Sarcasm employs ambivalence, where one says something positive but actually means negative, and vice versa. The essence of sarcasm, which is also a sufficient and necessary condition, is the conflict between literal and implied sentiments expressed in one sentence. However, it is difficult to recognize such sentiment conflict because the sentiments are mixed or even implicit. As a result, the recognition of sophisticated and obscure sentiment brings in a great challenge to sarcasm detection. In this paper, we propose a Dual-Channel Framework by modeling both literal and implied sentiments separately. Based on this dual-channel framework, we design the Dual-Channel Network~(DC-Net) to recognize sentiment conflict. Experiments on political debates (i.e. IAC-V1 and IAC-V2) and Twitter datasets show that our proposed DC-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance on sarcasm recognition. Our code is released to support research.
翻译:讽刺学则使用矛盾性,说了一些正面的,但实际上意味着消极的,反之亦然。讽刺学的精髓,也是一个充分和必要的条件。讽刺学的精髓,就是在一句话中表达的字面和隐含的情感之间的冲突。然而,很难认识到这种情绪冲突,因为情绪是混合的,甚至隐含的。结果,对复杂和模糊的情绪的承认给讽刺学的发现带来了巨大的挑战。在本文中,我们提议了一个双声道框架,将字面和隐含的情绪分别建模。基于这个双声道框架,我们设计了双声道网络~(DC-Net),以承认情绪冲突。关于政治辩论的实验(即IAC-V1和IAC-V2)和推特数据集显示,我们提议的DC-Net在讽刺学的认知上达到了最先进的表现。我们的代码发布是为了支持研究。