This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach via Bayesian quadrature and sensitivity analysis of the selection criterion for a lithium-ion battery model. The Bayesian model evidence is adopted as the metric, which can select the simplest but well-describing model based on Occam's razor principle. While the model evidence requires prohibitive integral computations over parameter space, Bayesian quadrature offers sample-efficient integration via model-based inference to minimise the number of battery model evaluations. The posterior distribution of battery model parameters can also be inferred as a byproduct in one go, which is also beneficial in creating a digital twin. The simplest lithium-ion battery models, equivalent circuit models, were used to analyse the sensitivity of the selection criterion at given different datasets and model configurations. We show that popular selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error, and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a correct model in a multimodal posterior case. The model evidence can spot the true model in such cases, simultaneously providing the variance of evidence inference itself as an indication of confidence. Bayesian quadrature can compute the evidence faster than popular MCMC solvers.
翻译:本文通过Bayesian二次曲线和对锂离子电池模型的选择标准进行Bayesian模型选择方法和敏感性分析,采用Bayesian模型证据作为衡量标准,可以根据Occam的剃刀原则选择最简单但描述良好的模型。虽然模型证据要求对参数空间进行令人望而却步的综合计算,但Bayesian二次曲线通过基于模型的推理提供样本效率高的整合,以尽量减少电池模型评估的数量。电池模型参数的后方分布也可以作为一个副产品来推断,这也有利于创建数字双胞胎。最简单的锂离子电池模型,相当于电路模型,用来分析不同数据集和模型配置中选择标准的敏感性。我们表明,流行的选择标准,如根值差差差差,和贝耶斯信息标准,无法在多式后方电池模型中选择正确的模型。模型证据可以在这类情况下发现真实模型,同时提供证据的差别,作为信任的表示。Bayesian 夸德罗摩公司能够更快地分析分辨率证据。