Image quality is important, and it can affect overall performance in image processing and computer vision as well as for numerous other reasons. Image quality assessment (IQA) is consequently a vital task in different applications from aerial photography interpretation to object detection to medical image analysis. In previous research, the BRISQUE algorithm and the PSNR algorithm were evaluated with high resolution ( 512*384 pixels per image), but relatively small image sets (4,744 images). However, scientists have not evaluated IQA algorithms on low resolution (32*32 pixels per image), multi-perturbation, big image sets (for example, 60,000 different images not counting their perturbations). This study explores these two IQA algorithms through experimental investigation. We first chose two deep learning image sets, CIFAR-10 and MNIST. Then, we added 68 perturbations that add noise to the images in specific sequences and noise intensities. In addition, we tracked the performance outputs of the two IQA algorithms with singly and multiply noised images. After quantitatively analyzing experimental results, we report the limitations of the two IQAs with these noised CIFAR-10 and MNIST image sets. We also explain three potential root causes for performance degradation. These findings point out weaknesses of the two IQA algorithms. The research results provide guidance to scientists and engineers developing accurate, robust IQA algorithms. In addition to supporting future scientific research and industrial projects, all source codes are shared on the website: https://github.com/caperock/imagequality
翻译:图像质量评估(IQA)是从航空摄影判读到检测到医学图像分析的不同应用中的一项重要任务。在以前的研究中,BRISQUE算法和PSNR算法经过高分辨率评估(每个图像512*384像素),但图像组较小(4,744图像)。然而,科学家们没有评估IQA在低分辨率(32*32像素/图像)、多扰动、大图像组(例如,60,000不同图像不计其扰动)方面的算法。因此,图像质量评估(IQA)是一项至关重要的任务。本研究通过实验性调查探索了这两种IQA的算法。我们首先选择了两个深层次的学习图像组,即CIFAR-10和MIST。然后,我们又增加了68个振动图,增加了特定序列和噪音组的图像组(4,744图像组)。此外,我们追踪了IQA的所有科学算法来源的性输出结果,没有增加任何图像组。在定量分析结果后,我们通过实验性分析结果,我们报告了两个IARQA的深度分析结果的局限性。我们还解释了IQA的这些基础分析。