From the fundamental theorem of screening (FTS) we obtain the following mathematical relationship relaying the pre-test probability of disease $\phi$ to the positive predictive value $\rho(\phi)$ of a screening test: $\displaystyle\lim_{\varepsilon \to 2}{\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}}{\rho(\phi)d\phi} = 1$ where $\varepsilon$ is the screening coefficient - the sum of the sensitivity ($a$) and specificity ($b$) parameters of the test in question. However, given the invariant points on the screening plane, identical values of $\varepsilon$ may yield different shapes of the screening curve since $\varepsilon$ does not respect traditional commutative properties. In order to compare the performance between two screening curves with identical $\varepsilon$ values, we derive two geometric definitions of the positive likelihood ratio (LR+), defined as the likelihood of a positive test result in patients with the disease divided by the likelihood of a positive test result in patients without the disease, which helps distinguish the performance of both screening tests. The first definition uses the angle $\beta$ created on the vertical axis by the line between the origin invariant and the prevalence threshold $\phi_e$ such that $LR+ = \frac{a}{1-b} = cot^2{(\beta)}$. The second definition projects two lines $(y_1,y_2)$ from the prevalence threshold to the invariant points and defines the LR+ as the ratio of its derivatives $\frac{dy_1}{dx}$ and $\frac{dy_2}{dx}$. Using the concepts of the prevalence threshold and the invariant points on the screening plane, the work herein presented provides a new geometric definition of the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) throughout the prevalence spectrum and describes a formal measure to compare the performance of two screening tests whose screening coefficients $\varepsilon$ are equal.
翻译:从基本筛选理论(FTS) 我们获得以下数学关系, 将测试前的疾病概率( 美元) 转介至检测测试的正预测值 $\rho( 美元) : $ dsplaystock\ lim\ varepsilon\ 到 2\ dsplaystate \ ⁇ 0\\\\ ⁇ 1\\\\ rho( phi)\phi} = 1美元, 其中美元是筛选系数( 敏感值( 美元) 和具体值( 美元) 参数。 然而, 鉴于筛查平面的不变化点, 美元 的数值( r) 的相同值值值可能产生不同的筛选曲线形状, 因为 $\ vareplassion\ premodeal_ rccession1 和 美元( 美元) 直径比值( 美元) 。 为了比较两次筛选曲线的数值, 我们得出两个正概率比率( LR+)的几何定义, 以正度检验结果的概率法值( 美元) 由第一次检测结果从病人的概率 美元 =xxxxxxx 开始, 在不使用该疾病中的测测测算取。