The local reference frame (LRF), as an independent coordinate system generated on a local 3D surface, is widely used in 3D local feature descriptor construction and 3D transformation estimation which are two key steps in the local method-based surface matching. There are numerous LRF methods have been proposed in literatures. In these methods, the x- and z-axis are commonly generated by different methods or strategies, and some x-axis methods are implemented on the basis of a z-axis being given. In addition, the weight and disambiguation methods are commonly used in these LRF methods. In existing evaluations of LRF, each LRF method is evaluated with a complete form. However, the merits and demerits of the z-axis, x-axis, weight and disambiguation methods in LRF construction are unclear. In this paper, we comprehensively analyze the z-axis, x-axis, weight and disambiguation methods in existing LRFs, and obtain six z-axis and eight x-axis, five weight and two disambiguation methods. The performance of these methods are comprehensively evaluated on six standard datasets with different application scenarios and nuisances. Considering the evaluation outcomes, the merits and demerits of different weight, disambiguation, z- and x-axis methods are analyzed and summarized. The experimental result also shows that some new designed LRF axes present superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art ones.
翻译:当地参考框架(LRF)是当地3D表面产生的独立协调系统,广泛用于3D地方特征描述仪和3D变换估算,这是当地基于方法的表面匹配的两个关键步骤。文献中提出了许多LRF方法。在这些方法中,x-和z-轴通常是不同方法或战略产生的,有些x-轴方法是在提供z-轴法的基础上实施的。此外,这些LRF方法中通常使用权重和模糊方法。在对LRF的现有评估中,每种LRF方法都以完整的形式加以评估。然而,兹-轴、x轴、重量和偏差方法的优缺点在文献中很多。在这些方法中,x-轴、x-轴、重量和偏差方法通常由不同的方法产生,我们全面分析现有LRFSx轴、x-轴、重量和模糊方法,并获得6 z-x-轴、8xx-轴、5份重和2个脱模糊方法。这些方法的性能和性能-直径,这些方法的性能和性能和性能-直径分析了六种标准结果和结果。