This paper reviews compact continuous-time formulations for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Specifically, we first point out a serious flaw in an existing start-end-event-based formulation owing to inconsistent mode choices. We propose two options to formulate the missing constraints and we consider an equivalent reformulation with sparser constraint matrix. Second, we formulate an aggregate variant of an existing model that relies on on-off-events and clarify the role of mode consistency issues in such models. Third, we suggest two variants of an existing network flow formulation. We enhance our models by adapting several techniques that have been used previously, e.g., in cases with only a single mode. A large set of benchmark instances from the literature provides the basis for an up-to-date and fair computational study with an out-of-the-box solver package. We compare our models against two models from the literature. Our experiments assert confidently that network flow formulations prevail in the test bed, and they provide a hint on why event-based models become less competitive in multi-mode settings.
翻译:本文回顾了多模式资源受限制的项目时间安排问题的连续时间缩写。 具体地说, 我们首先指出,由于模式选择不一致, 现有的以起始点为主的配制存在严重缺陷。 我们提出两种选择来制定缺失的制约, 我们考虑以稀疏的限制矩阵进行等效的重拟。 第二, 我们为依靠边上活动的现有模型制定一个综合变体, 并澄清模式一致性问题在这些模型中的作用。 第三, 我们建议了两种现有的网络流配制的变式。 我们通过调整以前使用的若干技术, 例如, 仅在单一模式的情况下, 来强化我们的模型。 文献中的大量基准实例为最新的、公平的计算研究提供了基础, 并使用一个软件外的软件包。 我们用文献中的两种模型比较我们的模型。 我们的实验自信地证明, 网络流配方在测试床里占上的位置, 并且它们提供了基于事件的模式在多模式环境中竞争力降低的原因的提示 。