Purpose: The introduction of artificial intelligence / machine learning (AI/ML) products to the regulated fields of pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) and drug manufacture, and medical devices (MD) and in-vitro diagnostics (IVD), poses new regulatory problems: a lack of a common terminology and understanding leads to confusion, delays and product failures. Validation as a key step in product development, common to each of these sectors including computerized systems and AI/ML development, offers an opportune point of comparison for aligning people and processes for cross-sectoral product development. Methods: A comparative approach, built upon workshops and a subsequent written sequence of exchanges, summarized in a look-up table suitable for mixed-teams work. Results: 1. A bottom-up, definitions led, approach which leads to a distinction between broad vs narrow validation, and their relationship to regulatory regimes. 2. Common basis introduction to the primary methodologies for AI-containing software validation. 3. Pharmaceutical drug development and MD/IVD specific perspectives on compliant AI software development, as a basis for collaboration. Conclusions: Alignment of the terms and methodologies used in validation of software products containing artificial intelligence / machine learning (AI/ML) components across the regulated industries of human health is a vital first step in streamlining processes and improving workflows.
翻译:目的:将人工智能/机器学习(AI/ML)产品引入制药研发(研发)和药物制造以及医疗装置(MD)和体外诊断(IVD)等受管制领域的制药研发(研发)和药物制造和医疗装置(MD)和体外诊断(IVD),带来了新的监管问题:缺乏共同的术语和理解导致混乱、延误和产品失灵;将验证作为产品开发的一个关键步骤,这是包括计算机化系统和AI/ML开发等每个部门共有的产品开发的关键步骤,为协调人员和跨部门产品开发过程提供了一个适当的比较点; 方法:以讲习班和随后的书面交流顺序为基础,并在适合混合小组工作的外观表格中加以总结; 结果:自下而上、定义引导、导致区分广泛与狭小的验证及其与监管制度的关系的方法; 共同提出含有软件的初始验证方法; 3. 药品开发和MD/IVD具体观点,将遵守国际标准软件开发作为合作的基础。