Given the wealth inequality worldwide, there is an urgent need to identify the mode of wealth exchange through which it arises. To address the research gap regarding models that combine equivalent exchange and redistribution, this study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid using the Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange. Two new exchange models based on multi-agent interactions are reconstructed following an econophysics approach for evaluating the Gini index (inequality) and total exchange (economic flow). Exchange simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of the total exchange divided by the Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using the wealth transfer rate and time period of redistribution and the surplus contribution rate of the wealthy and the saving rate. However, considering the coercion of taxes and its associated costs and independence based on the morality of mutual aid, a nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred. This is oriented toward Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D, with implications for alternatives to the capitalist economy.
翻译:鉴于世界范围内的财富不平等,迫切需要确定产生财富交换的模式。为了解决将等值交换和再分配相结合的模式方面的研究差距,本研究将等值市场交换与以权力中心为基础的再分配和以利用波兰尼、格雷伯和卡拉塔尼等交换方式相互援助的非等值交换进行比较。根据多种代理相互作用的两种新的交换模式在评估基尼指数(不平等)和总交换(经济流动)时采用生态物理方法加以重建。交换模拟表明,用同一饱和的曲线式对等公式来表示基尼指数所分割的总汇率的评价参数,使用财富转移率和重新分配时间以及富裕和储蓄率的盈余缴款率。然而,考虑到基于相互援助道德的税收胁迫及其相关成本和独立性,倾向于采用无回报义务的非等值交换。这面向格雷伯的基线共产主义和卡拉塔尼的交流模式D,对资本主义经济的替代方案具有影响。