We approach the question "What is Consciousness?" in a new way, not as Descartes' "systematic doubt", but as how organisms find their way in their world. Finding one's way involves finding possible uses of features of the world that might be beneficial or avoiding those that might be harmful. "Possible uses of X to accomplish Y" are "Affordances". The number of uses of X is indefinite (or unknown), the different uses are unordered, are not listable, and are not deducible from one another. All biological adaptations are either affordances seized by heritable variation and selection or, far faster, by the organism acting in its world finding uses of X to accomplish Y. Based on this, we reach rather astonishing conclusions: (1) Artificial general intelligence based on universal Turing machines (UTMs) is not possible, since UTMs cannot "find" novel affordances. (2) Brain-mind is not purely classical physics for no classical physics system can be an analogue computer whose dynamical behaviour can be isomorphic to "possible uses". (3) Brain mind must be partly quantum-supported by increasing evidence at 6.0 sigma to 7.3 sigma. (4) Based on Heisenberg's interpretation of the quantum state as "potentia" converted to "actuals" by measurement, where this interpretation is not a substance dualism, a natural hypothesis is that mind actualizes potentia. This is supported at 5.2 sigma. Then mind's actualizations of entangled brain-mind-world states are experienced as qualia and allow "seeing" or "perceiving" of uses of X to accomplish Y. We can and do jury-rig. Computers cannot. (5) Beyond familiar quantum computers, we discuss the potentialities of trans-Turing-systems.
翻译:我们以一种新的方式去探讨“什么是意识”的问题,而不是像德卡托斯的“系统怀疑”那样,而是像生物体如何在自己的世界中找到自己的方式。找到一个人的方法就是寻找世界特征的可能用途,这些特征可能是有益的,或者避免可能有害的东西。 “X可能用来完成Y”是“福特斯”。“X可能用来完成Y的用途”是“福特斯”。X的用途数量是无限的(或未知的),不同的用途是没有顺序的,没有列表,不能相互降低。所有生物的大脑适应要么是被遗传变异和选择所抓住的,或者,更快得多的,是被其世界生物体在寻找X的用途来完成Y。基于这一点,我们得出了相当令人惊讶的结论:(1)基于通用图灵机(UTMs)的人工一般情报是不可能的,因为UTMs不能“定义”新买得起。(2)大脑的分量不是纯粹的古典物理学体系的古典物理学,也不是一种模拟计算机,其动态行为可以“隐蔽地用来”“隐蔽地利用”。(3) 大脑大脑必须部分地用于“正变现的“正陈本的解读”,而“正态解释。