Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) helps to explain customers' opinions towards products and services. In the past, ABSA models were discriminative, but more recently generative models have been used to generate aspects and polarities directly from text. In contrast, discriminative models commonly first select aspects from the text, and then classify the aspect's polarity. Previous results showed that generative models outperform discriminative models on several English ABSA datasets. Here, we evaluate and contrast two state-of-the-art discriminative and generative models in several settings: cross-lingual, cross-domain, and cross-lingual and domain, to understand generalizability in settings other than English mono-lingual in-domain. Our more thorough evaluation shows that, contrary to previous studies, discriminative models can still outperform generative models in almost all settings.
翻译:基于外观的感官分析(ABSA)有助于解释客户对产品和服务的看法。过去,ABSA模式是歧视性的,但最近又使用基因模型直接从文字中产生一些方面和两极分化。相比之下,歧视模型通常先从文字中选择一些方面,然后对方面极性进行分类。以前的结果表明,在几个英国ABSA数据集中,基因模型优于歧视模式。在这里,我们评估和对比了两种最先进的歧视和基因模型:跨语言、跨语言、跨语言和跨领域模式,以了解除英语单语本体外环境中的通用性。我们更彻底的评估表明,与以往的研究相反,歧视模型仍然可以在几乎所有环境中超越成型的基因模型。