To evaluate disentangled representations several metrics have been proposed. However, theoretical guarantees for conventional metrics of disentanglement are missing. Moreover, conventional metrics do not have a consistent correlation with the outcomes of qualitative studies. In this paper we analyze metrics of disentanglement and their properties. We conclude that existing metrics of disentanglement were created to reflect different characteristics of disentanglement and do not satisfy two basic desirable properties: (1) assign a high score to representations that are disentangled according to the definition; and (2) assign a low score to representations that are entangled according to the definition. In addition, we propose a new metric of disentanglement and prove that it satisfies both of the properties.
翻译:为了评价相互脱钩的表述,提出了若干衡量标准,但缺乏传统脱节指标的理论保障;此外,传统衡量标准与定性研究的结果没有一致的关联性;在本文件中,我们分析了分解及其特性的衡量标准;我们的结论是,现有的分解指标是用来反映分解的不同特征,不能满足两种基本的适当属性:(1) 给根据定义相互脱节的表述分配高分;(2) 对根据定义相互缠绕的表述给予低分分分。此外,我们提出了新的分解指标,并证明它满足了这两种特性。