In Ukraine, Scopus data are used to evaluate academics. Existing shortcomings in the Ukrainian evaluation system allow them to publish in titles that have been delisted from Scopus, and continue to use those papers as credible research output for evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyse the publishing activity of Ukrainian institutions in Scopus-delisted titles (as of September 2021) in different fields between 2011 and 2020 and to attempt to appreciate how common this practice is among Ukrainian authors. Scopus was sourced to collect bibliographic and citations-related data, while SciVal was used to analyse these data. The findings suggest that for 17 Ukrainian institutions, papers from titles that have been delisted from Scopus still play an important part of the publication achievement of their employees. In particular, in the field of economics, econometrics and finance, 46.92% of Ukrainian papers were published in a title that was excluded from Scopus. Moreover, the analysis indicated that in two Ukrainian institutions, the level of citation of such papers significantly exceeds the average number of citations to Scopus-indexed papers in the same year and in the same field. Given that bibliometric indicators are also used for research assessment in other Eastern European countries, the results of this paper are applicable to a wider geographic context.
翻译:在乌克兰,Scopus数据被用于评估学术界,乌克兰评估系统的现有缺陷允许他们发表从Scopus除名的书刊,并继续使用这些文件作为可靠的研究成果,以进行评估,这项研究的目的是分析2011年至2020年期间乌克兰机构在不同领域的Scopus除名(截至2021年9月)出版活动,并试图了解乌克兰作者之间这种做法的常见性。Scopus收集书目和引文相关数据,SciVal则用来分析这些数据。调查结果显示,从Scopus除名的乌克兰17个机构的文件仍然在其雇员的出版成就中发挥重要作用,特别是在经济、计量和金融领域,乌克兰46.92%的论文以不包括在Scopus的题目发表。此外,分析表明,在乌克兰两个机构,此类文件的引用程度大大超过同一年和同一领域Scopus索引文件的平均引用次数。鉴于在东欧各国也使用了更广泛的地理评估结果。