Introduction. We study effect of different quality optical character recognition in interactive information retrieval with a collection of one digitized historical Finnish newspaper. Method. This study is based on the simulated interactive information retrieval work task model. Thirty-two users made searches to an article collection of Finnish newspaper Uusi Suometar 1869-1918 with ca. 1.45 million auto segmented articles. Our article search database had two versions of each article with different quality optical character recognition. Each user performed six pre-formulated and six self-formulated short queries and evaluated subjectively the top-10 results using graded relevance scale of 0-3 without knowing about the optical character recognition quality differences of the otherwise identical articles. Analysis. Analysis of the user evaluations was performed by comparing mean averages of evaluations scores in user sessions. Differences of query results were detected by analysing lengths of returned articles in pre-formulated and self-formulated queries and number of different documents retrieved overall in these two sessions. Results. The main result of the study is that improved optical character recognition quality affects perceived usefulness of historical newspaper articles positively. Conclusions. We were able to show that improvement in optical character recognition quality of documents leads to higher mean relevance evaluation scores of query results in our historical newspaper collection. To the best of our knowledge this simulated interactive user-task is the first one showing empirically that users' subjective relevance assessments are affected by a change in the quality of optically read text.
翻译:我们用一套数字化的历史芬兰报纸来研究交互式信息检索中不同质量光学特征识别的影响。方法:本研究以模拟交互式信息检索工作模型为基础。32个用户搜索了芬兰报纸Uusi Suometar 1869-1918年的藏书,其中有145万条自动分割文章。我们的文章搜索数据库有两版每篇文章的长度,具有不同质量光学特征识别。每个用户都进行了六种预制和六种自制短问,并用分级相关性尺度0-3对前十级结果进行了主观评价。结论:我们通过比较用户会议平均评价分数的平均平均数,对用户评价进行了分析。通过分析,发现查询结果的差异,在这两期会议中,对回回文章的长度进行了分析,对每篇文章的长度进行了不同的光学特征识别;每个用户进行了六种预制和六种自制短问询,并用分级尺度对十大结果进行了主观评价,对原本相同文章的分级比值为0-3。分析。分析:通过比较用户会议平均评分数的平均数,对用户评分数进行了更准确度评估,从而得出了对历史评级结果。