Impartial selection is the selection of an individual from a group based on nominations by other members of the group, in such a way that individuals cannot influence their own chance of selection. We give a deterministic mechanism with an additive performance guarantee of $O(n^{(1+\kappa)/2})$ in a setting with $n$ individuals where each individual casts $O(n^{\kappa})$ nominations, where $\kappa\in[0,1]$. For $\kappa=0$, i.e. when each individual casts at most a constant number of nominations, this bound is $O(\sqrt{n})$. This matches the best-known guarantee for randomized mechanisms and a single nomination. For $\kappa=1$ the bound is $O(n)$. This is trivial, as even a mechanism that never selects provides an additive guarantee of $n-1$. We show, however, that it is also best possible: for every deterministic impartial mechanism there exists a situation in which some individual is nominated by every other individual and the mechanism either does not select or selects an individual not nominated by anyone.
翻译:公正选择是指根据集团其他成员的提名从一个团体中挑选个人,这种方式使个人无法影响自己的甄选机会。我们给一个确定性机制,其附加性能保证为$O(n ⁇ (1 ⁇ )kapapa)/2}美元,在个人投出$O(n ⁇ kappa})美元提名的情况下,每个个人投出美元[0,1]美元。对于美元=0美元,即每个个人投出数量最多不变的提名时,这一限制是$O(sqrt{n})美元。这与最著名的随机化机制的保证和单一提名相符。对于美元=1美元的约束是$O(n)美元。这是无关紧要的,因为即使从不选择的机制也提供n-1美元的附加性保证。然而,我们表明,最有可能的是:对于每个个人提名的每个确定性公正机制都存在某种情况,而机制不是由其他个人提名的,而是由个人挑选或由任何人提名的。