Informed consent has become increasingly salient for data privacy and its regulation. Entities from governments to for-profit companies have addressed concerns about data privacy with policies that enumerate the conditions for personal data storage and transfer. However, increased enumeration of and transparency in data privacy policies has not improved end-users' comprehension of how their data might be used: not only are privacy policies written in legal language that users may struggle to understand, but elements of these policies may compose in such a way that the consequences of the policy are not immediately apparent. We present a framework that uses Answer Set Programming (ASP) -- a type of logic programming -- to formalize privacy policies. Privacy policies thus become constraints on a narrative planning space, allowing end-users to forward-simulate possible consequences of the policy in terms of actors having roles and taking actions in a domain. We demonstrate through the example of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) how to use the system in various ways, including asking questions about possibilities and identifying which clauses of the law are broken by a given sequence of events.
翻译:在数据隐私及其监管方面,政府实体和营利公司实体通过列举个人数据储存和转移条件的政策,解决了对数据隐私的关切,然而,数据隐私政策中更多的列举和透明度并没有提高最终用户对其数据如何使用的理解:不仅用户可能难以理解的法律语言编写的隐私政策,而且这些政策的要素可能构成这样一种方式,即政策的后果不会立即显现出来;我们提出了一个框架,利用 " 答案设定方案 " (ASP) -- -- 一种逻辑性方案编制 -- -- 来正式确定隐私政策;因此,隐私政策成为对叙述性规划空间的限制,允许最终用户在发挥作用和采取行动的行为者方面预先模拟该政策可能产生的后果;我们通过《健康保险可移动性和问责法》(HIPA)的例子,说明如何以各种方式使用这一系统,包括询问各种可能性,并确定哪些法律条款因某一系列事件而违反。