Artificial intelligence literature suggests that minority and fragile communities in society can be negatively impacted by machine learning algorithms due to inherent biases in the design process, which lead to socially exclusive decisions and policies. Faced with similar challenges in dealing with an increasingly diversified audience, the museum sector has seen changes in theory and practice, particularly in the areas of representation and meaning-making. While rarity and grandeur used to be at the centre stage of the early museum practices, folk life and museums' relationships with the diverse communities they serve become a widely integrated part of the contemporary practices. These changes address issues of diversity and accessibility in order to offer more socially inclusive services. Drawing on these changes and reflecting back on the AI world, we argue that the museum experience provides useful lessons for building AI with socially inclusive approaches, especially in situations in which both a collection and access to it will need to be curated or filtered, as frequently happens in search engines, recommender systems and digital libraries. We highlight three principles: (1) Instead of upholding the value of neutrality, practitioners are aware of the influences of their own backgrounds and those of others on their work. By not claiming to be neutral but practising cultural humility, the chances of addressing potential biases can be increased. (2) There should be room for situational interpretation beyond the stages of data collection and machine learning. Before applying models and predictions, the contexts in which relevant parties exist should be taken into account. (3) Community participation serves the needs of communities and has the added benefit of bringing practitioners and communities together.
翻译:人工智能文献表明,由于设计过程中固有的偏见,导致社会排斥性决定和政策的内在偏见,社会上少数群体和脆弱社区可能会受到机器学习算法的不利影响。面对与日益多样化的受众打交道的类似挑战,博物馆部门在理论和实践方面,特别是在代表性和意义创造领域,都看到了变化。虽然稀有和盛大的观念曾经是早期博物馆做法、民生和博物馆与他们所服务的不同社区的关系的中心阶段,成为当代做法的一个广泛融合的部分。这些变化涉及多样性和无障碍问题,目的是提供更具社会包容性的服务。借鉴这些变化并反思大赦国际的世界,我们认为,博物馆的经验提供了有益的教训,有助于以社会包容性的方法建设AI,特别是在需要整理或过滤收集和获取博物馆的理论和实践方面,正如在搜索引擎、建议系统和数字图书馆中经常出现的那样。我们强调三项原则:(1) 实践者不是维护中立的价值,而是认识到他们自身背景和他人对其工作的影响。通过不声称保持中立性,而是秉持文化谦虚伪,博物馆的经验为建立具有社会包容性的社区提供了有益的基础,因此,因此,在理解潜在偏见的收集过程中,应该有更多的机会。