Deep neural networks have triggered a revolution in artificial intelligence, having been applied with great results in medical imaging, semi-autonomous vehicles, ecommerce, genetics research, speech recognition, particle physics, experimental art, economic forecasting, environmental science, industrial manufacturing, and a wide variety of applications in nearly every field. This sudden success, though, may have intoxicated the research community and blinded them to the potential pitfalls of assigning deep learning a higher status than warranted. Also, research directed at alleviating the weaknesses of deep learning may seem less attractive to scientists and engineers, who focus on the low-hanging fruit of finding more and more applications for deep learning models, thus letting short-term benefits hamper long-term scientific progress. Gary Marcus wrote a paper entitled Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal, and here we discuss Marcus' core ideas, as well as attempt a general assessment of the subject. This study examines some of the limitations of deep neural networks, with the intention of pointing towards potential paths for future research, and of clearing up some metaphysical misconceptions, held by numerous researchers, that may misdirect them.
翻译:深神经网络引发了人工智能的革命,在医学成像、半自主车辆、电子商务、遗传学研究、语音识别、粒子物理学、实验艺术、经济预测、环境科学、工业制造以及几乎所有领域的广泛应用方面,都取得了巨大成果。不过,这一突如其来的成功可能给研究界带来毒害,使他们看不到深层学习地位高于应有地位的潜在陷阱。此外,旨在减轻深层学习弱点的研究对科学家和工程师来说似乎不太有吸引力,他们侧重于为深层学习模型寻找更多应用的低档成果,从而让短期利益阻碍长期科学进步。Gary Marcus撰写了一篇题为“深学习:批判性评估”的论文,我们在这里讨论Marcus的核心思想,并试图对这一主题进行总体评估。本研究报告研究了深层神经网络的一些局限性,目的是指出未来研究的潜在途径,并澄清许多研究人员持有的、可能误导他们的一些元物理错误观念。