Blockchain technology and, more generally, distributed ledger technology (DLT) systems, face public scrutiny for their energy consumption levels. However, many point out that high energy consumption is a feature of (small block size) proof-of-work (PoW) DLTs, but not of proof-of-stake (PoS) DLTs. With the energy consumption of PoS systems being an under-researched area, we replicate, expand and update embryonary work modelling it and comparing different PoS-based DLTs with each other and with other non-PoS systems. In doing so, we suggest and implement a number of improvements to an existing PoS energy consumption model. We find that there may be significant differences in the energy consumption of PoS systems analysed and confirm that, regardless of these differences, their energy consumption is several orders of magnitude below that of Bitcoin Core.
翻译:然而,许多人指出,高能源消耗是(小区块规模的)工作证明(PoW)工作证明(DLT)的一个特征,但并不是“获取证明(POS)DLT”的特征。 由于Pos系统的能源消耗是一个研究不足的领域,我们复制、扩大和更新了胚胎工作模型,并将不同的以POS为基础的DLT与其他非POS系统进行比较。我们为此建议和实施对现有POS能源消费模式的若干改进。我们发现,对Pos系统的能源消耗可能存在重大差异,并证实,不管这些差异如何,它们的能源消耗量都比Bitcoin核心低几个数量级。