Social media platforms have been establishing content moderation guidelines and employing various moderation policies to counter hate speech and misinformation. The goal of this paper is to study these community guidelines and moderation practices, as well as the relevant research publications, to identify the research gaps, differences in moderation techniques, and challenges that should be tackled by the social media platforms and the research community. To this end, we study and analyze fourteen most popular social media content moderation guidelines and practices, and consolidate them. We then introduce three taxonomies drawn from this analysis as well as covering over two hundred interdisciplinary research papers about moderation strategies. We identify the differences between the content moderation employed in mainstream and fringe social media platforms. Finally, we have in-depth applied discussions on both research and practical challenges and solutions.
翻译:社会媒体平台一直在制定内容温和准则,并采用各种温和政策来抵制仇恨言论和错误信息,本文件的目的是研究这些社区指南和温和做法,以及相关研究出版物,以查明研究差距、温和技术的差异,以及社会媒体平台和研究界应当应对的挑战。为此,我们研究和分析了14个最受欢迎的社会媒体中和准则和做法,并加以巩固。然后我们从这一分析中引入了3个分类,并覆盖了200多份关于温和战略的跨学科研究论文。我们确定了主流媒体平台和边缘社会媒体平台采用的内容温和之间的差异。最后,我们深入应用了关于研究以及实际挑战和解决办法的讨论。</s>