The Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) is a deterministic approach to Bayesian inference on latent Gaussian models (LGMs) and focuses on fast and accurate approximation of posterior marginals for the parameters in the models. Recently, methods have been developed to extend this class of models to those that can be expressed as conditional LGMs by fixing some of the parameters in the models to descriptive values. These methods differ in the manner descriptive values are chosen. This paper proposes to combine importance sampling with INLA (IS-INLA), and extends this approach with the more robust adaptive multiple importance sampling algorithm combined with INLA (AMIS-INLA). This paper gives a comparison between these approaches and existing methods on a series of applications with simulated and observed datasets and evaluates their performance based on accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. The approaches are validated by exact posteriors in a simple bivariate linear model; then, they are applied to a Bayesian lasso model, a Bayesian imputation of missing covariate values, and lastly, in parametric Bayesian quantile regression. The applications show that the AMIS-INLA approach, in general, outperforms the other methods, but the IS-INLA algorithm could be considered for faster inference when good proposals are available.
翻译:综合内分层Laplace Approcionation(INLA)是确定对潜潜潜高斯模型进行巴伊西亚测算的一种确定性方法,侧重于对模型参数的后边边缘进行快速和准确的近似。最近,开发了一些方法,通过确定模型中的一些参数以描述性值来将这一类模型扩展为有条件的LGMs。这些方法在描述性值的选择方式上各不相同。本文提议将重要取样与INLA(IS-INLA)相结合,并将这一方法与更强有力的适应性多重重要取样算法结合,并扩展到INAIDA(AMIS-INA)中。本文比较了这些方法与一系列模拟和观测数据集的应用的现有方法,并根据准确性、效率和稳健健性来评估其性。这些方法由精确的后代数以简单的双数线模型验证;然后,这些方法可以适用于Bayesian laso模型,一种巴伊西亚的缺失 Covarite值浸透度取样法,但巴伊萨氏式的缺异度测算法中,最后在AL-Asimalimal-Lestal-LestimalAdrographisal 中显示其他方法。