Representation learners that disentangle factors of variation have already proven to be important in addressing various real world concerns such as fairness and interpretability. Initially consisting of unsupervised models with independence assumptions, more recently, weak supervision and correlated features have been explored, but without a causal view of the generative process. In contrast, we work under the regime of a causal generative process where generative factors are either independent or can be potentially confounded by a set of observed or unobserved confounders. We present an analysis of disentangled representations through the notion of disentangled causal process. We motivate the need for new metrics and datasets to study causal disentanglement and propose two evaluation metrics and a dataset. We show that our metrics capture the desiderata of disentangled causal process. Finally, we perform an empirical study on state of the art disentangled representation learners using our metrics and dataset to evaluate them from causal perspective.
翻译:在解决各种现实世界关切方面,如公平性和可解释性。最初由不受监督的模型和独立假设构成,最近,对薄弱的监督和相关特征进行了探讨,但没有对基因过程进行因果分析。相反,我们在因果基因过程制度下开展工作,因为基因因素是独立的,或可能由一组被观察或未观察的共解者所混淆。我们分析了通过分解的因果关系过程的概念,对分解的表达方式进行分析。我们提出需要新的指标和数据集,以研究因果分解,并提出两个评价指标和数据集。我们表明,我们的指标抓住了分解的因果关系过程的边缘。最后,我们用我们的指标和数据集从因果角度评估艺术分解的代言者的状况进行了实证研究。