Area cartograms are map-based data visualizations in which the area of each map region is proportional to the data value it represents. Long found in print media, area cartograms have also become increasingly popular online, often serving as an accompaniment to news articles and blog posts. Despite their popularity, there is a dearth of cartogram generation tools accessible to non-technical users unfamiliar with Geographic Information Systems software. Few tools support the generation of contiguous cartograms (i.e., area cartograms that faithfully represent the spatial adjacency of neighboring regions). We review existing contiguous cartogram software and compare two web-based cartogram tools: fBlog and go-cart.io. We experimentally evaluated their usability with a user study comprising cartogram generation and analysis tasks. We adopted the System Usability Scale to quantify how participants perceived the usability of both tools. We also collected written feedback from participants to determine the main challenges for users of the software. Participants generally rated go-cart.io as more usable than fBlog. Compared to fBlog, go-cart.io offers a greater variety of built-in maps and allows importing data values by file upload. Still, our results suggest that even go-cart.io suffers from poor usability because the graphical user interface is complex and data can only be imported as a comma-separated-values file. We propose changes to go-cart.io and make general recommendations for web-based cartogram tools to address these concerns.
翻译:区域制图是基于地图的数据可视化,其中每个地图区域的面积与它所代表的数据值成正比。在印刷媒体中长期发现,区域制图也越来越受欢迎,在网上越来越受欢迎,常常成为新闻文章和博客文章的配套。尽管受到欢迎,但对于不熟悉地理信息系统软件的非技术用户来说,缺乏木图生成工具。很少有工具支持产生毗连的马图(即忠实代表相邻区域空间相近的区域)。我们审查现有的毗连木图软件,比较两个基于网络的木图工具:fBlog和go-cart.io。我们用用户研究来实验评估它们的可用性,包括制图制作和分析任务。我们采用了系统可用度表来量化参与者对两种工具的可用性。我们还收集了参与者的书面反馈,以确定软件用户面临的主要挑战。与会者一般将go-cart.io评为比fBlog更实用的。比较FBlog、go-cart.io、甚至两个基于网络的木图工具比较,我们用一个更多样化的用户可访问性模型来评估其可用性数据,因为我们只能通过不断进化的图表访问的地图和输入数据结果,因此,我们只能将这些用户的图表上流数据输入数据结果输入。