This position paper offers a framework to think about how to better involve human influence in algorithmic decision-making of contentious public policy issues. Drawing from insights in communication literature, we introduce a "public(s)-in-the-loop" approach and enumerates three features that are central to this approach: publics as plural political entities, collective decision-making through deliberation, and the construction of publics. It explores how these features might advance our understanding of stakeholder participation in AI design in contentious public policy domains such as recidivism prediction. Finally, it sketches out part of a research agenda for the HCI community to support this work.
翻译:这份立场文件为思考如何在有争议的公共政策问题的算法决策中更好地吸收人的影响提供了一个框架。我们从通信文献的见解中引入了“公众在圈中”的方法,并列举了这一方法的核心三个特征:公众作为多元政治实体,通过审议集体决策,以及建设公众。它探讨了这些特征如何能增进我们对利益攸关方在诸如累犯预测等有争议的公共政策领域参与大赦国际设计的理解。最后,它勾画出HCI社区支持这项工作的研究议程的一部分。