Since group activities have become very common in daily life, there is an urgent demand for generating recommendations for a group of users, referred to as group recommendation task. Existing group recommendation methods usually infer groups' preferences via aggregating diverse members' interests. Actually, groups' ultimate choice involves compromises between members, and finally, an agreement can be reached. However, existing individual information aggregation lacks a holistic group-level consideration, failing to capture the consensus information. Besides, their specific aggregation strategies either suffer from high computational costs or become too coarse-grained to make precise predictions. To solve the aforementioned limitations, in this paper, we focus on exploring consensus behind group behavior data. To comprehensively capture the group consensus, we innovatively design three distinct views which provide mutually complementary information to enable multi-view learning, including member-level aggregation, item-level tastes, and group-level inherent preferences. To integrate and balance the multi-view information, an adaptive fusion component is further proposed. As to member-level aggregation, different from existing linear or attentive strategies, we design a novel hypergraph neural network that allows for efficient hypergraph convolutional operations to generate expressive member-level aggregation. We evaluate our ConsRec on two real-world datasets and experimental results show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods. An extensive case study also verifies the effectiveness of consensus modeling.
翻译:由于团体活动在日常生活中变得司空见惯,因此迫切需要为用户群体提出建议,称为团体建议任务。现有的团体建议方法通常通过汇集不同成员的利益来推断团体的偏好。实际上,团体的最终选择涉及成员之间的妥协,最后可以达成协议。然而,现有的个人信息汇总缺乏整体的团体层面考虑,无法获取共识信息。此外,它们的具体汇总战略要么存在高昂的计算成本,要么过于粗糙,无法做出准确的预测。为了解决上述局限性,我们本文件侧重于探索群体行为数据背后的共识。为了全面捕捉团体的共识,我们创新地设计了三种不同的观点,以提供相互补充的信息,使多视角学习成为可能,包括成员层面的汇总、项目层面的口味和群体层面的固有偏好。为了整合和平衡多视角信息,还进一步提议了适应性融合部分。关于成员层面的模型汇总,不同于现有的线性或专注型战略,我们设计了一个新型的超光层神经网络,以便能够在团体行为数据中进行高效的超前演化操作,从而产生显性成员层面的共识。我们还评估了两组级的案例研究结果。