Estimating treatment effects is of great importance for many biomedical applications with observational data. Particularly, interpretability of the treatment effects is preferable for many biomedical researchers. In this paper, we first provide a theoretical analysis and derive an upper bound for the bias of average treatment effect (ATE) estimation under the strong ignorability assumption. Derived by leveraging appealing properties of the Weighted Energy Distance, our upper bound is tighter than what has been reported in the literature. Motivated by the theoretical analysis, we propose a novel objective function for estimating the ATE that uses the energy distance balancing score and hence does not require correct specification of the propensity score model. We also leverage recently developed neural additive models to improve interpretability of deep learning models used for potential outcome prediction. We further enhance our proposed model with an energy distance balancing score weighted regularization. The superiority of our proposed model over current state-of-the-art methods is demonstrated in semi-synthetic experiments using two benchmark datasets, namely, IHDP and ACIC.
翻译:估计治疗效果对于许多具有观测数据的生物医学应用非常重要。特别是,对许多生物医学研究人员来说,治疗效果的可解释性是更可取的。在本文中,我们首先提供理论分析,并在强烈忽视的假设下为平均治疗效果(ATE)估计的偏差得出一个上限。通过利用加权能源距离的吸引力性能,我们的上限比文献中所报道的要紧。根据理论分析,我们提出了一个新的目标功能,用于估计使用能源距离平衡得分因而不需要正确说明常态评分模型的ATE。我们还利用最近开发的神经添加模型来改进用于潜在结果预测的深层学习模型的可解释性。我们进一步加强了我们提议的模型,以能量距离平衡得分加权整制。我们提议的模型优于当前状态的方法,在使用两个基准数据集即IHDP和ACIC进行的半合成实验中得到了证明。