Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) disrupts how humans interact with technology. Recently, OpenAI introduced ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art dialogue model that can converse with its human counterparts with unprecedented capabilities. ChatGPT has witnessed tremendous attention from the media, academia, industry, and the general public, attracting more than a million users within days of its release. However, its explosive adoption for information search and as an automated decision aid underscores the importance to understand its limitations and biases. This paper focuses on one of democratic society's most important decision-making processes: political elections. Prompting ChatGPT with 630 political statements from two leading voting advice applications and the nation-agnostic political compass test in three pre-registered experiments, we uncover ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian ideology. For example, ChatGPT would impose taxes on flights, restrict rent increases, and legalize abortion. In the 2021 elections, it would have voted most likely for the Greens both in Germany (B\"undnis 90/Die Gr\"unen) and in the Netherlands (GroenLinks). Our findings are robust when negating the prompts, reversing the order of the statements, varying prompt formality, and across languages (English, German, Dutch, and Spanish). We conclude by discussing the implications of politically biased conversational AI on society.
翻译:交流人工智能(AI)干扰了人类与技术互动的方式。 最近,OpenAI引入了热GPT,这是一个最先进的对话模式,可以与具有前所未有的能力的人类对口方进行交流。 热GPT看到媒体、学术界、产业界和一般公众的极大关注,在发布后几天内吸引了100多万用户。然而,它为信息搜索和自动决策援助的爆炸性采纳凸显了理解其局限性和偏见的重要性。 本文侧重于民主社会最重要的决策过程之一:政治选举。 推动热GPT,由两个领先的投票咨询应用程序和三个预先登记的实验中的国家不可接受的政治指南测试发表了630项政治声明。 我们发现了热点PT的亲环境、左翼意识形态。 例如,热点GPT会征收飞行税,限制房租上涨,并使堕胎合法化。 在2021年的选举中,它最有可能对德国的绿党(B\"undnis 90/Die Gr\\\unen)和荷兰的(GroonLinks commissional commission) aral dicial dicialal diversal comsiansal sacial sacial sess。