Collaborative problem solving (CPS) enables student groups to complete learning tasks, construct knowledge, and solve problems. Previous research has argued the importance to examine the complexity of CPS, including its multimodality, dynamics, and synergy from the complex adaptive systems perspective. However, there is limited empirical research examining the adaptive and temporal characteristics of CPS which might lead to an oversimplified representation of the real complexity of the CPS process. To further understand the nature of CPS in online interaction settings, this research collected multimodal process and performance data (i.e., verbal audios, computer screen recordings, concept map data) and proposed a three-layered analytical framework that integrated AI algorithms with learning analytics to analyze the regularity of groups collaboration patterns. The results detected three types of collaborative patterns in groups, namely the behaviour-oriented collaborative pattern (Type 1) associated with medium-level performance, the communication - behaviour - synergistic collaborative pattern (Type 2) associated with high-level performance, and the communication-oriented collaborative pattern (Type 3) associated with low-level performance. The research further highlighted the multimodal, dynamic, and synergistic characteristics of groups collaborative patterns to explain the emergence of an adaptive, self-organizing system during the CPS process.
翻译:合作解决问题(CPS)使学生群体能够完成学习任务、建立知识和解决问题。以前的研究认为,必须从复杂的适应系统的角度审查CPS的复杂性,包括其多式联运、动态和协同作用。然而,对CPS的适应性和时间特点的实证研究有限,这可能导致过分简化CPS进程真正复杂性的表述。为了进一步理解CPS在网上互动环境中的性质,这项研究收集了多式联运进程和绩效数据(即口头录音、计算机屏幕录音、概念地图数据),并提出了一个三层分析框架,将AI算法与学习分析分析小组协作模式的规律性结合起来。研究结果发现,在小组中发现了三种协作模式,即与中等绩效相关的面向行为的合作模式(类型1)、与高层绩效相关的通信-行为-协同合作模式(类型2),以及与低水平绩效相关的通信-面向合作模式(类型3)。研究还进一步突出介绍了在C-A类协作模式的自我调整过程中出现的多式联运、动态和协同特征。