Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is used in several countries around the world. It requires voters to rank candidates in order of preference, and uses a counting algorithm that is more complex than systems such as first-past-the-post or scoring rules. An even more complex system, the single transferable vote (STV), is used when multiple candidates need to be elected. The complexity of these systems has made it difficult to audit the election outcomes. There is currently no known risk-limiting audit (RLA) method for STV, other than a full manual count of the ballots. A new approach to auditing these systems was recently proposed, based on a Dirichlet-tree model. We present a detailed analysis of this approach for ballot-polling Bayesian audits of IRV elections. We compared several choices for the prior distribution, including some approaches using a Bayesian bootstrap (equivalent to an improper prior). Our findings include that the bootstrap-based approaches can be adapted to perform similarly to a full Bayesian model in practice, and that an overly informative prior can give counter-intuitive results. Via carefully chosen examples, we show why creating an RLA with this model is challenging, but we also suggest ways to overcome this. As well as providing a practical and computationally feasible implementation of a Bayesian IRV audit, our work is important in laying the foundation for an RLA for STV elections.
翻译:全世界几个国家都使用即决投票(IRV),它要求选民按偏好排列候选人,并使用比先得先得或得分规则等系统更加复杂的计数算法。一个更为复杂的系统,即单一可转移投票(STV),在需要选举多个候选人时使用更复杂的系统,即单一可转移投票(STV),这些系统的复杂性使审计选举结果难以审计。目前,除了对选票进行完整的人工计票外,没有已知的STV风险限制审计(RLA)方法。最近,根据Drichlet-tree模式提出了审计这些系统的新办法。我们为投票投票投票对Bayesian选举的审计提出了详细分析方法。我们比较了先前分配的几种选择,包括使用Bayesian靴杆的一些方法(相当于以前的不适当做法 ) 。我们的调查结果包括,基于靴杆式的审计方法可以调整,以便在实践中与完整的Bayesian模式相类似,而过于信息化之前可以提供反直觉的结果。我们仔细选择的SVA的计算方法,也是我们进行一个具有挑战性的SBay-R的推理的推理基础。