Estimating a fair linear regression model subject to a user-defined level of fairness can be achieved by solving a non-convex quadratic programming optimisation problem with quadratic constraints. In this work we propose an alternative, more flexible approach to this task that enforces a user-defined level of fairness by means of a ridge penalty. Our proposal addresses three limitations of the former approach: it produces regression coefficient estimates that are more intuitive to interpret; it is mathematically simpler, with a solution that is partly in closed form; and it is easier to extend beyond linear regression. We evaluate both approaches empirically on five different data sets, and we find that our proposal provides better goodness of fit and better predictive accuracy while being equally effective at achieving the desired fairness level. In addition we highlight a source of bias in the original experimental evaluation of the non-convex quadratic approach, and we discuss how our proposal can be extended to a wide range of models.
翻译:在这项工作中,我们建议了另一种更灵活的方法来完成这项任务,通过山脊罚款来强制实施用户确定的公平程度。我们的提案涉及前一种方法的三个局限性:它产生回归系数估计数,更直观地解释;它数学上比较简单,解决办法部分是封闭式的;更容易扩大范围,超越线性回归。我们对五套不同的数据集的经验性评估,我们发现我们的提案提供了更合适、更准确的预测性,同时对达到理想的公平水平同样有效。此外,我们还强调了最初对非convex二次曲线法进行实验性评估时的偏差来源,我们讨论了如何将我们的提案推广到广泛的模型。