In this paper, we reveal a mechanism behind a false accuracy verification encountered with unstructured-grid schemes based on solution reconstruction such as UMUSCL. Third- (or higher-) order of accuracy has been reported for the Euler equations in the literature, but UMUSCL is actually second-order accurate at best for nonlinear equations. False high-order convergence occurs generally for a scheme that is high order for linear equations but second-order for nonlinear equations. It is caused by unexpected linearization of a target nonlinear equation due to too small of a perturbation added to an exact solution used for accuracy verification. To clarify the mechanism, we begin with a proof that the UMUSCL scheme is third-order accurate only for linear equations. Then, we derive a condition under which the third-order truncation error dominates the second-order error and demonstrate it numerically for Burgers' equation. Similar results are shown for the Euler equations, which disprove some accuracy verification results in the literature. To be genuinely third-order, UMUSCL must be implemented with flux reconstruction.
翻译:在本文中,我们揭示了一个基于UMUSCL等解决方案重建的无结构电网计划所遭遇的虚假准确性核查背后的机制。文献中报告了Euler方程式的第三(或更高)级准确性,但UMUSCL实际上是非线性方程式的第二级准确性。对线性方程式来说,一个高端组合一般是一个高顺序但非线性方程式的第二顺序的图案。它是由目标非线性方程式的意外线性化造成的,因为用于精确性核查的精确性解决方案中增加的扰动过小。为了澄清这一机制,我们首先要证明UMUSCL方案仅对线性方程式而言是第三顺序准确性的。然后,我们得出一个条件,即第三顺序调出错控制着第二顺序的错误,并以数字方式显示Burgers的方程式。欧洲方程式的类似结果也显示,该等方程式在文献中推翻了某些准确性核查结果。要真正做到第三顺序,UUSCL必须用不断的重建来完成。