Athey and Segal introduced an efficient budget-balanced mechanism for a dynamic stochastic model with quasilinear payoffs and private values, using the solution concept of perfect Bayesian equilibrium. We show that this implementation is not robust in multiple senses, especially for at least 3 agents. For example, we will show a generic setup where all efficient strategy profiles can be eliminated by iterative elimination of weakly dominated strategies. Furthermore, this model used strong assumptions about the information of the agents, and the mechanism was not robust to the relaxation of these assumptions. In this paper, we will show a different mechanism that implements efficiency under weaker assumptions and uses the stronger solution concept of ``efficient Nash equilibrium with guaranteed expected payoffs''.
翻译:他们和Segal采用了一个有效的预算平衡机制,用于使用完美贝叶斯平衡的解决方案概念,采用准线性报酬和私人价值的动态随机模型。我们表明,这一实施在多种意义上并不健全,至少对3个代理商来说尤其如此。例如,我们将展示一个通用的设置,通过迭代消除弱势战略,可以消除所有高效战略概况。此外,这一模式对代理商的信息使用了强有力的假设,而这一机制对这些假设的放松并不有力。在本文中,我们将展示一个不同的机制,在较弱假设下实施效率,并使用“高效纳什平衡和有保证的预期收益”这一更强有力的解决方案概念。