Staggered adoption of policies by different units at different times creates promising opportunities for observational causal inference. Estimation remains challenging, however, and common regression methods can give misleading results. A promising alternative is the synthetic control method (SCM), which finds a weighted average of control units that closely balances the treated unit's pre-treatment outcomes. In this paper, we generalize SCM, originally designed to study a single treated unit, to the staggered adoption setting. We first bound the error for the average effect and show that it depends on both the imbalance for each treated unit separately and the imbalance for the average of the treated units. We then propose "partially pooled" SCM weights to minimize a weighted combination of these measures; approaches that focus only on balancing one of the two components can lead to bias. We extend this approach to incorporate unit-level intercept shifts and auxiliary covariates. We assess the performance of the proposed method via extensive simulations and apply our results to the question of whether teacher collective bargaining leads to higher school spending, finding minimal impacts. We implement the proposed method in the augsynth R package.
翻译:在不同时间,不同单位错开采用政策,为观察因果推断创造了有希望的机会。但估计仍然具有挑战性,共同回归方法可能会产生误导的结果。一个有希望的替代办法是合成控制方法(SCM),该方法发现控制单位的加权平均数,密切平衡了被处理单位的预处理结果。在本文中,我们将最初旨在研究单一处理单位的SCM推广到错开的采用环境。我们首先将平均效果错误绑定,并表明它取决于每个被处理单位的不平衡和被处理单位平均的不平衡。然后,我们提出“部分集中”SCM加权权,以尽量减少这些措施的加权组合;只注重平衡两个组成部分之一的做法可能导致偏差。我们扩大这一方法,将单位一级的拦截转移和辅助共变换纳入其中。我们通过广泛的模拟评估了拟议方法的绩效,并将我们的结果应用于教师集体谈判是否导致较高的学校开支,发现影响最小的问题。我们在Augsyn R一揽子办法中实施拟议的方法。