Causal inference grows increasingly complex as the number of confounders increases. Given treatments $X$, confounders $Z$ and outcomes $Y$, we develop a non-parametric method to test the \textit{do-null} hypothesis $H_0:\; p(y|\text{\it do}(X=x))=p(y)$ against the general alternative. Building on the Hilbert Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) for marginal independence testing, we propose backdoor-HSIC (bd-HSIC) and demonstrate that it is calibrated and has power for both binary and continuous treatments under a large number of confounders. Additionally, we establish convergence properties of the estimators of covariance operators used in bd-HSIC. We investigate the advantages and disadvantages of bd-HSIC against parametric tests as well as the importance of using the do-null testing in contrast to marginal independence testing or conditional independence testing. A complete implementation can be found at \hyperlink{https://github.com/MrHuff/kgformula}{\texttt{https://github.com/MrHuff/kgformula}}.
翻译:随着混淆者数量的增加,致癌率的推断越来越复杂。考虑到治疗费用X美元、迷惑者Z美元和结果美元,我们开发了一种非参数方法,以测试\ textit{do-null}假设值$H_0:\;p(y}text_it do}(X=x)=p(y)美元相对于一般替代物。在Hilbert Schmit独立标准(HSIC)的基础上,我们建议进行边际独立测试,我们建议进行后门-HSIC(bd-HSIC),并表明它经过校准,在大量同源体下能够进行二进制和连续的治疗。此外,我们建立了bd-HSIC中所使用的同异性操作者估计值的趋同性特性。我们调查了bd-HSIC的利弊,以及使用 donull测试与边际独立测试或有条件的独立测试相比的重要性。在\hyperlink{https://github.com/MHuff/khuff_kgmastriful_hstrus.