The increasing sophistication of NLP models has renewed optimism regarding machines achieving a full human-like command of natural language. Whilst work in NLP/NLU may have made great strides in that direction, the lack of conceptual clarity in how 'understanding' is used in this and other disciplines have made it difficult to discern how close we actually are. A critical, interdisciplinary review of current approaches and remaining challenges is yet to be carried out. Beyond linguistic knowledge, this requires considering our species-specific capabilities to categorize, memorize, label and communicate our (sufficiently similar) embodied and situated experiences. Moreover, gauging the practical constraints requires critically analyzing the technical capabilities of current models, as well as deeper philosophical reflection on theoretical possibilities and limitations. In this paper, I unite all of these perspectives -- the philosophical, cognitive-linguistic, and technical -- to unpack the challenges involved in approaching true (human-like) language understanding. By unpacking the theoretical assumptions inherent in current approaches, I hope to illustrate how far we actually are from achieving this goal, if indeed it is the goal.
翻译:国家语言方案模型日益精密,使人们对各种机器实现完全人性化的自然语言指令重新感到乐观。尽管国家语言方案/国家语言方案的工作可能在这方面取得了巨大进展,但在这个和其他学科中,“理解”的使用方式在概念上缺乏明确性,因此难以辨别我们实际上有多接近。对目前的方法和尚存的挑战,还有待进行批判性、跨学科的审查。除了语言知识外,这要求考虑我们特定物种的分类、记忆、标签和交流我们(足够相似的)所体现和位置的经验的能力。此外,衡量实际制约因素需要严格分析当前模型的技术能力,以及更深刻的理论思考理论可能性和局限性。在本文中,我综合了所有这些观点 -- -- 哲学、认知语言和技术观点 -- -- 来解析真正(人种)语言理解所涉及的挑战。通过解开当前方法所固有的理论假设,我希望说明我们实际上离实现这一目标有多远,如果它确实就是目标的话。