Environmental variability often has substantial impacts on natural populations and communities through its effects on the performance of individuals. Because organisms' responses to environmental conditions are often nonlinear (e.g., decreasing performance on both sides of an optimal temperature), the mean response is often different from the response in the mean environment. Ye et. al. 2020, proposed testing for the presence of such variance effects on individual or population growth rates by estimating the "Jensen Effect", the difference in average growth rates under varying versus fixed environments, in functional single index models for environmental effects on growth. In this paper, we extend this analysis to effect of environmental variance on reproduction and survival, which have count and binary outcomes. In the standard generalized linear models used to analyze such data the direction of the Jensen Effect is tacitly assumed a priori by the model's link function. Here we extend the methods of Ye et. al. 2020 using a generalized single index model to test whether this assumed direction is contradicted by the data. We show that our test has reasonable power under mild alternatives, but requires sample sizes that are larger than are often available. We demonstrate our methods on a long-term time series of plant ground cover on the Idaho steppe.
翻译:由于生物体对环境条件的反应往往是非线性(例如,最佳温度两侧的性能下降),因此,平均反应往往不同于平均环境的反应。Ye等人,2020年,拟议通过估计“Jensen effector”(Jensen effector),对个人或人口增长率的这种差异性影响进行测试,通过估计“Jensen effect”(Jensen effect)和固定环境中不同环境的平均增长率与固定环境的平均增长率的差异,通过功能性单一指数模型衡量对增长的环境影响。在本文中,我们将这一分析扩大到环境差异对繁殖和生存的影响,这些环境差异有计算和二元结果。在用于分析这些数据的标准通用直线性模型中,Jensen effect(Jensen effect) 的方向被该模型的链接功能默认为前置。在这里,我们使用通用的单一指数模型扩展了Ye et al. 2020年的方法,以测试这一假定的方向是否与数据相矛盾。我们显示我们的试验在较轻的替代品下具有合理的能量,但所需的样本尺寸往往大于可得到的。我们在Idape的长时间系列植物地面覆盖上展示我们的方法。