In this article, we study the effect of vector-valued interventions in votes under a binary voter model, where each voter expresses their vote as a $0-1$ valued random variable to choose between two candidates. We assume that the outcome is determined by the majority function, which is true for a democratic system. The term intervention includes cases of counting errors, reporting irregularities, electoral malpractice etc. Our focus is to analyze the effect of the intervention on the final outcome. We construct statistical tests to detect significant irregularities in elections under two scenarios, one where exit poll data is available and more broadly under the assumption of a cost function associated with causing the interventions. Relevant theoretical results on the consistency of the test procedures are also derived. Through a detailed simulation study, we show that the test procedure has good power and is robust across various settings. We also implement our method on three real-life data sets. The applications provide results consistent with existing knowledge and establish that the method can be adopted for crucial problems related to political elections.
翻译:在本篇文章中,我们研究了在二进制投票模式下,以病媒估价方式对投票进行干预的影响,即每个选民以价值0-1美元的价值随机变量表示其投票,以在两名候选人之间作出选择;我们假定结果由多数功能决定,对民主制度来说就是如此;干预一词包括计数错误、报告违规行为、选举不当行为等。我们的重点是分析干预对最终结果的影响。我们建立统计测试,以在两种情景下发现选举的重大违规情况,一种情景是可以获得退出投票数据,而另一种情景则更宽泛地假设与造成干预有关的费用功能。还得出了测试程序一致性的相关理论结果。我们通过详细的模拟研究,表明测试程序具有良好能力,而且在不同环境中都非常健全。我们还在三个真实数据集上采用我们的方法。应用的结果与现有知识相符,并确定可以采用这种方法处理与政治选举有关的关键问题。