The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) system has become a rich resource for understanding the complex mechanisms of graft failure after kidney transplant, a crucial step for allocating organs effectively and implementing appropriate care. As transplant centers that treated patients might strongly confound graft failures, Cox models stratified by centers can eliminate their confounding effects. Also, since recipient age is a proven non-modifiable risk factor, a common practice is to fit models separately by recipient age groups. The moderate sample sizes, relative to the number of covariates, in some age groups may lead to biased maximum stratified partial likelihood estimates and unreliable confidence intervals even when samples still outnumber covariates. To draw reliable inference on a comprehensive list of risk factors measured from both donors and recipients in SRTR, we propose a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models. We establish asymptotic properties and verify via simulations that our method produces consistent estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage probabilities. Accounting for nearly 100 confounders in SRTR, the de-biased method detects that the graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor's age among all recipient age groups, and that organs from older donors more adversely impact the younger recipients. Our method also delineates the associations between graft failure and many risk factors such as recipients' primary diagnoses (e.g. polycystic disease, glomerular disease, and diabetes) and donor-recipient mismatches for human leukocyte antigen loci across recipient age groups. These results may inform the refinement of donor-recipient matching criteria for stakeholders.
翻译:移植接受者科学登记处(SRTR)系统已成为了解肾移植后肾脏移植后肾脏衰竭的复杂机制的丰富资源,这是有效分配器官和实施适当护理的关键步骤。治疗病人的移植中心可能非常容易弥补肾脏衰竭,因此中心将考克斯模式分流,可以消除其令人困惑的影响。此外,由于接受年龄是一个已证明无法修改的风险因素,一种常见的做法是分别按接受年龄群体来调整模型。相对于共变数而言,中度抽样规模在某些年龄组中可能导致偏差最大偏差的部分概率估计和不可靠的信任间隔,即使样本仍然超过共变数。为了可靠地推断从捐赠者和接受者中测量的风险因素综合清单中得出可靠的推论,我们建议通过四分解程序来降低拉索的不利影响。我们通过模拟来确定零度特性,并核实我们的方法产生一致的估算值和信任度的比值差。在SRTRTRG中接近100的相对偏差性部分估计和信任间隔期,在SLITRG的接受者中,对不可靠的接受者中近100次的诊断因素进行会计核算,而接受者对年龄年龄标准标准标准的计算方法则会测测测测测测出,而接受者之间,而接受者会更老的风险年龄年龄年龄的计算方法会增加。