We introduce a causal framework for designing optimal policies that satisfy fairness constraints. We take a pragmatic approach asking what we can do with an action space available to us and only with access to historical data. We propose two different fairness constraints: a moderation breaking constraint which aims at blocking moderation paths from the action and sensitive attribute to the outcome, and by that at reducing disparity in outcome levels as much as the provided action space permits; and an equal benefit constraint which aims at distributing gain from the new and maximized policy equally across sensitive attribute levels, and thus at keeping pre-existing preferential treatment in place or avoiding the introduction of new disparity. We introduce practical methods for implementing the constraints and illustrate their uses on experiments with semi-synthetic models.
翻译:我们引入一个因果框架,以设计满足公平性制约的最佳政策,我们采取务实的方法,问我们如何利用我们可利用的行动空间,并且只能获取历史数据。我们提出了两种不同的公平性制约:一种是中度打破制约,旨在阻挡行动中的温和道路,并保持对结果的敏感属性;另一种是尽可能减少行动空间许可在成果水平上的差异;另一种是平等利益制约,旨在将新的和最大化政策带来的收益在敏感属性层面平等分配,从而保持原有的优惠待遇,或避免引入新的差异。我们引入了实施这些制约的实用方法,并展示其在半合成模型实验中的用途。