Graphical models such as Markov random fields (MRFs) that are associated with undirected graphs, and Bayesian networks (BNs) that are associated with directed acyclic graphs, have proven to be a very popular approach for reasoning under uncertainty, prediction problems and causal inference. Parametric MRF likelihoods are well-studied for Gaussian and categorical data. However, in more complicated parametric and semi-parametric settings, likelihoods specified via clique potential functions are generally not known to be congenial or non-redundant. Congenial and non-redundant DAG likelihoods are far simpler to specify in both parametric and semi-parametric settings by modeling Markov factors in the DAG factorization. However, DAG likelihoods specified in this way are not guaranteed to coincide in distinct DAGs within the same Markov equivalence class. This complicates likelihoods based model selection procedures for DAGs by "sneaking in" potentially unwarranted assumptions about edge orientations. In this paper we link a density function decomposition due to Chen with the clique factorization of MRFs described by Lauritzen to provide a general likelihood for MRF models. The proposed likelihood is composed of variationally independent, and non-redundant closed form functionals of the observed data distribution, and is sufficiently general to apply to arbitrary parametric and semi-parametric models. We use an extension of our developments to give a general likelihood for DAG models that is guaranteed to coincide for all members of a Markov equivalence class. Our results have direct applications for model selection and semi-parametric inference.
翻译:与无方向图形相关的Markov随机字段(MRFs)等图形模型和与定向环状图相关的Bayesian网络(BNs)被证明是在不确定性、预测问题和因果关系推论下进行推理的非常流行的方法。对Gaussian和绝对数据来说,参数MRF的可能性是很好地研究的。但是,在更为复杂的参数和半参数环境中,通过分层潜在功能规定的可能性一般不为人所知,但通常不为人所知的是相近或非重复的图象。在本文中,通过在DAG因子化中模拟Markov因素、预测问题和因因因因因果推论而设定的参数和半参数设置,比较容易在参数和半参数设置中做出说明。但是,以这种方式说明的DAGs概率概率与同一的Markov等等值类别中不同的DAGs相匹配。这使得以基于模型的模型为基础的选择程序更加复杂,所有关于边缘方向的假设都可能是不合理的。在本文中,我们将因Chen的密度函数分解和半参数推算的DAG值模型中,我们一般的分级选择的分解模型的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果是充分的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果的分解结果。